Doctors' Working Lives News
Please send any news items to admin@idwl.info. If you don't see any new items, try clicking here to refresh the page.
Get notified by email when I update this site?
Monday, June 20, 2005
Single night shifts with 2 hours sleep?
The BMJ editorial Junior doctors' shifts and sleep deprivation was all over the papers at the end of last week. The group of writers, who include Dame Carol Black and Professor Roy Pounder of the RCP, argue that weeks of nights are dangerous and that single night shifts, or at most three nights in a row, should be used.
The thrust of the article is that while average hours have come down, the move to full shifts with weeks of nights means that on certain weeks doctors will be working up to 91 hours. The negative effects of this have been shown in the RCP survey Working the Night Shift and the authors make a good point. Their use of the Landrigan study, the main study linking hours to medical errors, is slightly less compelling as that study is technically about average hours over a 4-week period, not hours worked in a single week of continuous shifts. However, they do list some important research and anecdotal evidence to suggest that a 91-hour week of nights is not a good working pattern for doctors or patients.
The article also suggests that single nights cause least distortion to circadian rhythms. There is evidence for this, though it is equally beneficial to put people onto several weeks of night shifts at a time (not very good for their family life, of course). On the other hand, the article doesn't go into the risks associated with decreased continuity of care, the implications for organising the medical take, or the fact that single nights do often mean more days off which may further restrict training opportunities (the authors feel this would have a limited additional effect). These points are raised in the Rapid Responses to the article, though the responses are so far mostly supportive.
The authors also make the extremely contentious point that doctors should be required to have 2 hours sleep on a night shift. This appears to be drawn from the finding in the RCP survey that night shift doctors tend to sleep for 2 hours during the night and have problems sleeping during the day. However, since it's more than possible that those two things are linked - ie if you are sleeping for two hours during the night, you will have problems sleeping during the day - perhaps the 2-hour sleep should actually be discouraged! Naps of 20-40 minutes, though, have certainly been shown to have a beneficial effect. (NB The "this is really a partial shift, we should all be getting 3 hours sleep and everyone is really non-compliant" argument resurfaces in one of the rapid responses - bear in mind that an employment tribunal ruled against this argument last year.)
This is an important editorial which highlights a genuine difficulty within the shift sytem. It also makes some good suggestions about how to promote sleep during the day. Unfortunately, like most similar articles, it does not engage with the experiences of other night shift staff, most importantly nurses, who have to work continuous night shifts and are forbidden to rest at night. The issue of night shift work affects more than just doctors and needs to be addressed in a multiprofessional way.
This article has been featured in a number of newspapers, notably the Daily Mail. This also quotes the BMA JDC Chair, Simon Eccles, who agrees with the principle but also encourages hospitals to pursue Hospital at Night solutions and keep on call rooms available for full shift doctors.
New poll: Should weeks of nights be phased out?
Oh, and 83% of you thought that Nestle had lost the plot by getting rid of the foil wrappers on KitKats. So not all change is good, eh?
Discussion forum
Brian Jones has posted a question about DRS calculations for natural breaks on study leave days - comments please!
In other news:
Hospital doctors need a new career structure (BMJ)
How to teach and learn under the EWTD (BMJCF)
Computer access for hospital doctors poor, says BMA (E-Health Insider)
Doctors and the art of timewasting (BMJCF)
Replace doctors with robots! (BMJCF)
DRS news
The rollout of version 2 of DRS, the doctors' rostering and monitoring software, is continuing - the SHAs have details of this. A version of DRS including new flexible trainee calculations will be available soon.
Ian Rothwell has joined the DRS team as the DRS Support Worker. Ian will be handling all support calls and regularly monitoring the DRS forums. He can be contacted at ian@drsusers.com or on 07768 640374.
Diary cards and other templates
I'm also in the process of uploading templates for diary cards and fraud forms, etc, so people can see what's happening in other Trusts and adapt for their own use. These can be found in the Downloadable Documents section.
The thrust of the article is that while average hours have come down, the move to full shifts with weeks of nights means that on certain weeks doctors will be working up to 91 hours. The negative effects of this have been shown in the RCP survey Working the Night Shift and the authors make a good point. Their use of the Landrigan study, the main study linking hours to medical errors, is slightly less compelling as that study is technically about average hours over a 4-week period, not hours worked in a single week of continuous shifts. However, they do list some important research and anecdotal evidence to suggest that a 91-hour week of nights is not a good working pattern for doctors or patients.
The article also suggests that single nights cause least distortion to circadian rhythms. There is evidence for this, though it is equally beneficial to put people onto several weeks of night shifts at a time (not very good for their family life, of course). On the other hand, the article doesn't go into the risks associated with decreased continuity of care, the implications for organising the medical take, or the fact that single nights do often mean more days off which may further restrict training opportunities (the authors feel this would have a limited additional effect). These points are raised in the Rapid Responses to the article, though the responses are so far mostly supportive.
The authors also make the extremely contentious point that doctors should be required to have 2 hours sleep on a night shift. This appears to be drawn from the finding in the RCP survey that night shift doctors tend to sleep for 2 hours during the night and have problems sleeping during the day. However, since it's more than possible that those two things are linked - ie if you are sleeping for two hours during the night, you will have problems sleeping during the day - perhaps the 2-hour sleep should actually be discouraged! Naps of 20-40 minutes, though, have certainly been shown to have a beneficial effect. (NB The "this is really a partial shift, we should all be getting 3 hours sleep and everyone is really non-compliant" argument resurfaces in one of the rapid responses - bear in mind that an employment tribunal ruled against this argument last year.)
This is an important editorial which highlights a genuine difficulty within the shift sytem. It also makes some good suggestions about how to promote sleep during the day. Unfortunately, like most similar articles, it does not engage with the experiences of other night shift staff, most importantly nurses, who have to work continuous night shifts and are forbidden to rest at night. The issue of night shift work affects more than just doctors and needs to be addressed in a multiprofessional way.
This article has been featured in a number of newspapers, notably the Daily Mail. This also quotes the BMA JDC Chair, Simon Eccles, who agrees with the principle but also encourages hospitals to pursue Hospital at Night solutions and keep on call rooms available for full shift doctors.
New poll: Should weeks of nights be phased out?
Oh, and 83% of you thought that Nestle had lost the plot by getting rid of the foil wrappers on KitKats. So not all change is good, eh?
Discussion forum
Brian Jones has posted a question about DRS calculations for natural breaks on study leave days - comments please!
In other news:
Hospital doctors need a new career structure (BMJ)
How to teach and learn under the EWTD (BMJCF)
Computer access for hospital doctors poor, says BMA (E-Health Insider)
Doctors and the art of timewasting (BMJCF)
Replace doctors with robots! (BMJCF)
DRS news
The rollout of version 2 of DRS, the doctors' rostering and monitoring software, is continuing - the SHAs have details of this. A version of DRS including new flexible trainee calculations will be available soon.
Ian Rothwell has joined the DRS team as the DRS Support Worker. Ian will be handling all support calls and regularly monitoring the DRS forums. He can be contacted at ian@drsusers.com or on 07768 640374.
Diary cards and other templates
I'm also in the process of uploading templates for diary cards and fraud forms, etc, so people can see what's happening in other Trusts and adapt for their own use. These can be found in the Downloadable Documents section.
Friday, June 03, 2005
Natural breaks, EWTD changes - and Stepford Nurses?
Poll results: Pay protection - shock swing in voting
From what date should Trusts apply pay protection to rotational posts?
The date the doctor is appointed to the rotation: 54%
The date the doctor is informed that they'll be rotating to that specific Trust: 21%
The date the Trust writes to the doctor, offering the post: 26%
Well, how very interesting. Until fairly recently "appointment to the rotation" was way behind, supporting the view expressed by NHS Employers (and acknowledged, though not supported, by the BMA) that doctors can't be pay protected if they don't know where they're rotating to. However, a massive late rush of votes has pushed "appointment to the rotation" into the lead.
Well, there you have it. The debate continues..... Another poll will be posted soon - in the meantime an interim poll is up.
Natural breaks: GMSHA survey
You may remember the earlier discussion on whether doctors need 100% natural breaks to be compliant. The Greater Manchester SHA have now sent out the results of their natural breaks survey - well worth reading! (Thanks to Yasmin Ahmed-Little for this information.)
European news
BMA: Employees should have the right to opt out (Politics.co.uk)
Q&A on the Working Time Directive (Guardian)
EWTD opt out (Sunday Herald)
EWTD - the balance between flexibility and security (Herald)
Wasted time - an article in favour of the opt out (Times). Hilariously, this polemic decides to name and shame the MEPs who voted to scrap it - or as the writer puts it, "Let us not forget the guilty in this crime against common sense".
Mixed response from doctors on EWTD vote (BMJ, subscription only)
The Mondaq article also has a useful timeline at the bottom showing when all the key EWTD amendments were made.
Data on working time across Europe (EIRO)
EWTD breaches
Staff in Teesside "breaching EWTD to find car parking spaces" (Evening Gazette)
Doctors in Brussels breaching EWTD? (Letter to the Times)
Staffing
4 in 10 overseas nurses thinking of leaving NHS, says King's Fund study
Contract negotiations
BMA and NHS Employers start negotiating new SAS contract
Patient care and clinical errors
NCEPOD survey finds substandard ICU care (Liverpool Echo) - consultants need to be more available (BMJ)
Clinical leadership in hospitals must be improved to reduce basic errors (BMJ)
New ways of working
Minor ops nurses slammed by junior doctors (Scotsman) - but Simon Eccles defends them
Doctors object to wider role for surgical care practitioners (BMJ)
Robodoc - the latest Robot Doctor or Stepford Nurse? E-Health Insider reports that "leaders in the profession have cautioned against using it as a substitute for nurses. According to Nursing Times, the robot can take observations, such as blood pressure, by reading information from a ‘smart’ gown, but the British Association of Critical Care Nurses says nursing is about treating the whole patient, not just monitoring clinical signs." (The mind boggles as to who was suggesting replacing nurses with robots...other than Channel 4, maybe....)
Accommodation, shifts and sleep
Time to review how we work at night (Letter, BMJCF) A thoughtful and accurate response to recent letters demanding decent on call rooms for doctors.
Working and sleeping around the clock - Second annual Sleep Loss Symposium (MJA)
Training
Experiences from an FY2 pilot (BMJCF)
Assessment tools for foundation year programmes (BMJCF)
Peer review assessment tool assessed junior doctors reliably (BMJ)
Flexible working
Flexible Careers advice (BMJCF) Anyone else find the question a little troubling from a work-life balance point of view?
Tips for doctors
Working as a pregnant junior doctor (BMJCF)
Making a management plan for weekend work (BMJCF)
Compiling a departmental handbook (BMJCF)
Making an impact at meetings where you don't know anyone (BMJCF)
How to be a really good bully (BMJCF) Fascinating article with a huge number of responses.
From what date should Trusts apply pay protection to rotational posts?
The date the doctor is appointed to the rotation: 54%
The date the doctor is informed that they'll be rotating to that specific Trust: 21%
The date the Trust writes to the doctor, offering the post: 26%
Well, how very interesting. Until fairly recently "appointment to the rotation" was way behind, supporting the view expressed by NHS Employers (and acknowledged, though not supported, by the BMA) that doctors can't be pay protected if they don't know where they're rotating to. However, a massive late rush of votes has pushed "appointment to the rotation" into the lead.
Well, there you have it. The debate continues..... Another poll will be posted soon - in the meantime an interim poll is up.
Natural breaks: GMSHA survey
You may remember the earlier discussion on whether doctors need 100% natural breaks to be compliant. The Greater Manchester SHA have now sent out the results of their natural breaks survey - well worth reading! (Thanks to Yasmin Ahmed-Little for this information.)
European news
BMA: Employees should have the right to opt out (Politics.co.uk)
Q&A on the Working Time Directive (Guardian)
EWTD opt out (Sunday Herald)
EWTD - the balance between flexibility and security (Herald)
Wasted time - an article in favour of the opt out (Times). Hilariously, this polemic decides to name and shame the MEPs who voted to scrap it - or as the writer puts it, "Let us not forget the guilty in this crime against common sense".
Mixed response from doctors on EWTD vote (BMJ, subscription only)
The Mondaq article also has a useful timeline at the bottom showing when all the key EWTD amendments were made.
Data on working time across Europe (EIRO)
EWTD breaches
Staff in Teesside "breaching EWTD to find car parking spaces" (Evening Gazette)
Doctors in Brussels breaching EWTD? (Letter to the Times)
Staffing
4 in 10 overseas nurses thinking of leaving NHS, says King's Fund study
Contract negotiations
BMA and NHS Employers start negotiating new SAS contract
Patient care and clinical errors
NCEPOD survey finds substandard ICU care (Liverpool Echo) - consultants need to be more available (BMJ)
Clinical leadership in hospitals must be improved to reduce basic errors (BMJ)
New ways of working
Minor ops nurses slammed by junior doctors (Scotsman) - but Simon Eccles defends them
Doctors object to wider role for surgical care practitioners (BMJ)
Robodoc - the latest Robot Doctor or Stepford Nurse? E-Health Insider reports that "leaders in the profession have cautioned against using it as a substitute for nurses. According to Nursing Times, the robot can take observations, such as blood pressure, by reading information from a ‘smart’ gown, but the British Association of Critical Care Nurses says nursing is about treating the whole patient, not just monitoring clinical signs." (The mind boggles as to who was suggesting replacing nurses with robots...other than Channel 4, maybe....)
Accommodation, shifts and sleep
Time to review how we work at night (Letter, BMJCF) A thoughtful and accurate response to recent letters demanding decent on call rooms for doctors.
Working and sleeping around the clock - Second annual Sleep Loss Symposium (MJA)
Training
Experiences from an FY2 pilot (BMJCF)
Assessment tools for foundation year programmes (BMJCF)
Peer review assessment tool assessed junior doctors reliably (BMJ)
Flexible working
Flexible Careers advice (BMJCF) Anyone else find the question a little troubling from a work-life balance point of view?
Tips for doctors
Working as a pregnant junior doctor (BMJCF)
Making a management plan for weekend work (BMJCF)
Compiling a departmental handbook (BMJCF)
Making an impact at meetings where you don't know anyone (BMJCF)
How to be a really good bully (BMJCF) Fascinating article with a huge number of responses.
This site is maintained by Ellie Pattinson. All rights reserved. This website is maintained independently of the NHS and the views expressed are not necessarily a reflection of the views of that organisation. For any queries, contributions or amendments, please email me on admin@idwl.info.
